Posted Mon, Aug, 20,2012
Libertas encourages readers to register to join the Palliative Care: Research and Treatment peer review group. Being a volunteer peer reviewer is a great way to support Palliative Care: Research and Treatment and assist your colleagues who have submitted manuscripts to the journal.
The peer review process has been designed to make this vital task as quick and well-organized as possible so reviewers’ time is used efficiently. This means that reviewers can focus on assessing papers rather than navigating obstructive web interfaces.
We survey our peer reviewers to maintain an understanding of their perspective on the peer review process. The feedback from peer reviewers has been overwhelmingly positive:
Dr Sharilyn Almodovar says: "I was pleased to serve as a peer reviewer for Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics. Its scope will hopefully blur some of the lines that still exist between clinical and basic science. The diligence of the editorial staff ensures the review process is fair, fast and very well-organized. I highly recommend potential authors and reviewers to submit to and review for this journal."
Dr Ajay K. Nooka says: "It was a pleasure and honor to be a peer reviewer for Libertas Academica. The review process is extremely streamlined and seems effortless; at the same time yielding high quality material. Great balance."
To register now visit the peer review registration page here
Posted in: Processing Speed and Quality
Fri 17 May, 2013Ophthalmology and Eye Disease Now on PubMed
Fri 17 May, 2013RNAi Stratagems Against HIV-1
Thu 16 May, 2013Journal of Central Nervous System Disease on PubMed
Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology is very much conscious of time. Every step is done thoroughly and rapidly. The reviewers' comments are constructive. There is regular contact with the authors, providing explanations where necessary. The visibility also enjoyed by one's article once it is published is worthy of note. Thanks for making publishing with you so easy and enjoyable.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)