Close
Help
Need Help?



Latest Libertas Article Visibility Statistics

Posted Mon, Sep, 17,2012

The latest visibility statistics for the Libertas website are now available and article views have just exceeded 8.3 million. Article downloads since 2012 are just over 2.6 million and Libertas has over 74,000 registered users. The most viewed article has nearly 36,000 views, and the most cited article over 400 citations.

Statistics from PubMed have also recently been updated, and article views through this website now number almost 1.3 million.

Such high visibility is possible because of the post publication promotion Libertas offers. Working with 49 databases and 12 directories means articles are accessible in full from many different places, and promotion in over 8 different social media channels means articles are highly visible.

These statistics are updated live on the Libertas website along with the number of article downloads, the most read article, and more.

View more statistics here

share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
Cancer Informatics has become an increasingly important source for research in the methodology of cancer genomics and the novel use of informatics technology. I have been impressed by the journal's contents and have been very gratified by the number of accesses to my recent publication. Cancer Informatics has filled an important gap in cancer research journals.
Dr Richard Simon (Chief, Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, USA )
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results