Close
Help
Need Help?
Search



Impact Factor for Evolutionary Bioinformatics

Posted Tue, Nov, 30,2010

Impact factor has been updated since this news item was released.  To see the current impact factor visit the Evolutionary Bioinformatics homepage.

Libertas is pleased to announce that Evolutionary Bioinformatics has been assigned an impact factor of 1.889.  

That this new journal has achieved this solid impact factor reflects the quality of its articles and the high-regard it is held in by its audience.

Evolutionary Bioinformatics is also indexed by a large number of prestigious external indexes including Pubmed, EMBase and numerous EBSCO databases.

Submissions are processed to first editorial decision in just 21 days, and the journal's high quality editorial board ensures that high speed is combined with high editorial quality.  

Sign up to receive notification of the latest articles and visit the Evolutionary Bioinformatics homepage.

UPDATE: 2010 impact factor now 2.864 

share on

Posted in: Visibility and DiscoverabilityImpact Factors

News Categories

RECENT ENTRIES

Fri 24 May, 2013

Treatment of Recurrent HNSCC

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
My experience with Libertas Academica was very positive from submission to acceptance.  The reviewers' comments were constructive.  There was excellent feedback throughout. The author interface was user-friendly and very effective. Overall I would recommend publishing with Libertas Academica.
Dr Mena Soory (Dental Institute, King's College London, London, UK)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results