Posted Tue, Nov, 01,2011
The unofficial impact factor for Perspectives in Medicinal Chemistry was recently updated. It’s unofficial impact factor is 1.250.
Unofficial impact factors are estimated based on the number of articles and citations in a journal, and are usually higher for serials which have been publishing for a longer time. For a journal only established in 2007, an unofficial impact factor this high is very impressive.
Perspectives in Medicinal Chemistry's respectable unofficial impact factor was made possible by the fact that it is open access, meaning all articles are available online for anyone to read and download for free.
The widely respected editorial board and high quality peer review process have also helped to increase the number of citations and article views for Perspectives in Medicinal Chemistry.
All articles published in Perspectives in Medicinal Chemistry will benefit from high readership and citation rates backed up by the journal’s high unofficial impact factor.
This achievement for such a new journal was made possible by the extensive visibility we have established for Perspectives in Medicinal Chemistry, indexing it in:
Pubmed
Chemical Abstracts Service
Directory of Open Access Journals
EBSCO Academic Search Complete
EMBase
Google Scholar
Index Copernicus
OAlster
Open J-Gate
Pubget
Pubmed Central
SCOPUS
Socolar
Visit the Perspectives in Medicinal Chemistry homepage and view the Editor in Chief’s calls for papers here
Posted in: Impact Factors
News Categories
Wed 22 May, 2013
Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (ARVC/D)Tue 21 May, 2013
Article Reprint Service Available NowTue 21 May, 2013
Review of Targeted Therapies for Advanced HCC
My experience with the review stages and manuscript processing in Cancer Growth and Metastasis has been of excellence. The fine balance of times utilized for proper scientific assessment of the material and quality control is greatly commended.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube