Publication Date: 22 Mar 2012
Type: Review
Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics
Citation: Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics 2012:4 65-74
doi: 10.4137/CMT.S5764
Atazanavir (ATV) is an HIV protease inhibitor (PI) that was approved as antiretroviral agent in year 2003. Ritonavir (RTV) enhances ATV plasma exposure and increases its barrier to resistance. Antiretroviral therapy with ATV plus RTV (ATV/r) has demonstrated high potency for achieving virological suppression in antiretroviral-naïve patients and in simplification strategies. In rescue interventions, ATV/r-based combinations have shown to be equivalent in terms of viral response to other PI/r-containing regimens. In contrast with all other PIs, ATV has also demonstrated efficacy when given unboosted with RTV, an option attractive in special situations. Other benefits of the drug are its good metabolic and gastrointestinal profile. Its main adverse event is hyperbilirubinemia, since ATV inhibits the hepatic uridin-glucoronyl-transferase. A signature mutation at the protease gene, I50L, confers loss of susceptibility to the drug whereas it may confer hypersusceptibility to other PIs. Many ATV studies have provided data until or beyond week 96, supporting the efficacy and safety of the drug in the long-term.
PDF (555.84 KB PDF FORMAT)
RIS citation (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)
BibTex citation (BIBDESK, LATEX)
It's been a great experience publishing in Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics. I'm really impressed with the high quality, professional and constructive of peer review in the short time-frame. The editorial team is very helpful and I always received quick answers when I had questions. I am glad to have worked with Libertas Academica and I highly recommend publishing in Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube