Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Reviews in Therapeutics

167,045 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Management of Chronic Hyperuricemia with Febuxostat

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 12 Jul 2011

Journal: Clinical Medicine Reviews in Therapeutics

Citation: Clinical Medicine Reviews in Therapeutics 2011:3

doi: 10.4137/CMRT.S1626

Abstract

Gout is a common and painful rheumatologic disorder affecting 1 to 2 percent of adults in developed countries. Allopurinol remains the most commonly prescribed agent for gout in the United States. Unfortunately, many patients treated with allopurinol do not achieve target serum uric acid (sUA) levels, possibly due to the need for dosage adjustment in patients with renal insufficiency and the perceived intolerability to allopurinol in doses greater than 300 mg per day. Febuxostat, an oral non-purine inhibitor of xanthine oxidase, was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for chronic management of hyperuricemia in patients with gout. The purpose of this manuscript is to review the data with febuxostat compared with allopurinol and to discuss their relative place in therapy.


Downloads

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)




Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
The submission process was made very simple and easy, and I found the journal's staff to be very receptive and helpful. The online process was very user-friendly. I hope to work with this journal again in the future.
Dr Mathew L Nguyen (University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results