Close
Help
signup_email_alerts
Need Help?



Moving on up: Second-Line Agents as Initial Treatment for Newly-Diagnosed Patients with Chronic Phase CML

Submit a Paper


Libertas Analytics


1422 Article Views

Publication Date: 23 Jun 2011

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology

Citation: Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology 2011:5 185-199

doi: 10.4137/CMO.S6416

CMIonc journal

390,869 Article Views

7,185,320 Libertas Article Views

More Statistics

The Editor-in-Chief has endorsed this article

The review is concise and covers a broad aspect of initial treatment of newly-diagnosed patients with chronic phase CML with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

About this endorsement

Abstract

The treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) was revolutionized by the development of imatinib mesylate, a small molecule inhibitor of several protein tyrosine kinases, including the ABL1 protein tyrosine kinase. The current second generation of FDA-approved ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors, dasatinib and nilotinib, are more potent inhibitors of BCR-ABL1 kinase in vitro. Originally approved for the treatment of patients who were refractory to or intolerant of imatinib, dasatinib and nilotinib are now also FDA approved in the first-line setting. The choice of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (ie, standard or high dose imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib) to use for initial therapy in chronic-phase CML (CML-CP) will not always be obvious. Therapy selection will depend on both clinical and molecular factors, which we will discuss in this review.


Post a Comment

x close

Discussion Add A Comment
No comments yet...Be the first to comment.


share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (Less Than 3 Weeks)
  • Fair & Comprehensive Peer Review
  • Professional Author Service
  • Leading Editors in Chief
  • Extensive Indexing
  • High Readership & Impact
  • What Your Colleagues Say

Quick Links

Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.

BROWSE CATEGORIES
Our Testimonials
Recently we published a paper describing cloning of a new kinase gene, MLK4, in Genomics Insights. I was impressed by the prompt processing and  speed of publication.  The comments from the reviewers allowed me to improve the paper significantly.  The reviews were scientifically deep and objective, which is very valuable because in many journals decisions to publish or not to publish are very unfair and subjective. I highly recommend that other researchers publish their papers in Genomics Insights.
Dr Eugene R. Zabarovsky (Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden) What Your Colleagues Say