Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology

603,932 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Multicentric Adenocarcinomas in a Long-Segment of Barrett’s Esophagus

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 09 Jun 2008

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology

Citation: Clinical Medicine: Oncology 2008:2 441-443

Abstract

This report describes a complicated course of a 58-year-old patient with multicentric Barrett’s carcinoma within a long-segment of Barrett metaplasia. After abdominal-thoracic resection of the cancer, with incomplete removal of the long-segment metaplastic lesion, invasive carcinoma was diagnosed in the remnant Barrett’s segment. Endoscopic mucosal resection was done, but Barrett’s mucosa was left in situ again. Recurrent tumor growth was diagnosed only few months later. Finally, transthoracic complete resection on the remnant Barrett’s segment was performed. Thus, our case demonstrates impressively the appearance of multicentric adenocarcinomas in Barrett’s esophagus and underlines the necessity of resection of the complete Barrett mucosa.


Downloads

PDF  (166.56 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML




Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology
I must really send you all my compliments for your prompt processing and very uncomplicated way of dealing with manuscripts.  Thank you very much for keeping up with all these details!  I will surely recommend your journal and publishing group to other colleagues.
Dr Tsambika A. Psaras (Universitätsklinik für Neurochirurgie, Tübingen, Germany)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results