Publication Date: 18 Mar 2008
Journal: Drug Target Insights
Citation: Drug Target Insights 2008:3 27-29
1Dept. of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. 2Dept. of Clinical Neurosciences, Brown University, Providence, RI.
Abstract
Atypical antipsychotics (AA) are commonly used to manage drug-induced psychosis (DIP) in parkinsonian patients. In the treatment of schizophrenia, AA’s have been associated with increasing reports of new-onset diabetes mellitus (DM). This study examined the risk of developing new-onset DM among parkinsonian patients on long-term, low dose quetiapine. Fifty-three parkinsonian subjects (mean age: 71.3 years) taking an average quetiapine dose of 70.5 mg/day (range: 12.5–350 mg/day) for a mean duration of 21.3 months (range 3–61 months) were reviewed. Eight out of 53 subjects carried a diagnosis of DM prior to quetiapine treatment. Four out of 45 patients (8.9%) met criteria for new diagnosis of DM, giving a total prevalence rate of 22.6% (12 out of 53). This prevalence rate of 22.6% was slightly higher than that reported in the aged-matched general population (year 2003 DM prevalence = 17.3% for 65–74 years) but methodological differences could explain the difference. Larger epidemiologic studies will be needed to confirm these results as they could potentially impact a significant number of patients.
PDF (180.04 KB PDF FORMAT)
RIS citation (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)
BibTex citation (BIBDESK, LATEX)
I have had contact with Drug Target Insights several times, and every time I am impressed by the handling of the manuscript. The website is very, very user-friendly. It is easy to submit a manuscript. The entire process is easy and straightforward. The corresponding author is kept updated on the progress at every point. The editors of Libertas were helpful and prompt in responding to questions and issues related to the submission I am pleased ...
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube