Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Medical Equipment Insights

22,769 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

New Tools for a New Job-Single Port Laparoscopic Surgery Equipment

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 16 Dec 2009

Type: Review

Journal: Medical Equipment Insights

Citation: Medical Equipment Insights 2009:2 1-7

Abstract

Single port transumbilical laparoscopic surgery (LESS, SILS, ENOTES) is a technique which has recently emerged with a view to improving the cosmesis following minimal access surgery, aiming to achieve ‘scarless’ surgery. This rapidly progressing technique is facilitated by developments in port and instrument technology, allowing surgeons to perform a wider range of surgical procedures with increasing ease. This paper aims to summarise the equipment available at present for single port surgery.


Downloads

PDF  (3.92 MB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)




Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
testimonial_image
I had a great experience publishing our paper in Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology. The review was prompt and fair and once it was accepted with the revisions, the editorial office was very clear and helpful with updates on the progress at each step of the publication process.  I had prompt email responses to my questions.  I will definitely try to publish more papers in this journal in the future.  Keep up the good work. ...
Dr Jan Moreb (University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results