2346 Article Views
Publication Date: 26 Sep 2007
Journal: Evolutionary Bioinformatics 2007:3 263-266
Abstract Wendy Mok1, Kelly Seto2 and Jon Stone3
1Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton ON L8S 4K1, Canada. 2Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, University of Toronto, 1 King’s College Circle, Toronto ON M5S 1A8, Canada. 3Department of Biology and Origins Institute, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton ON L8S 4K1, Canada.
Abstract: Researchers routinely adopt molecular clock assumptions in conducting sequence analyses to estimate dates for viral origins in humans. We used computational methods to examine the extent to which this practice can result in inaccurate ‘retrodiction.’ Failing to account for dynamic molecular evolution can affect greatly estimating index case dates, resulting in an overestimated age for the SARS-CoV-human infection, for instance.
Discussion
No comments yet...Be the first to comment.
I was requested to contribute a review. The objectives, timelines and process were all extremely reasonable and fit in well with my knowledge base and my work as well as my schedule. The process was quite seamless and no paper was ever exchanged--everything was completed on-line. Thanks for the opportunity to make this contribution.Dr Michael E. Trigg (North Wales, PA, USA) What our authors say
Copyright © 2010 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)