Close
Help
signup_email_alerts
Need Help?



On the Use of Bootstrapped Topologies in Coalescent-Based Bayesian MCMC Inference: A Comparison of Estimation and Computational Efficiencies

Submit a Paper


Libertas Analytics


4859 Article Views

Publication Date: 31 Jul 2009

Journal: Evolutionary Bioinformatics

Citation: Evolutionary Bioinformatics 2009:5 97-105

EB journal

517,956 Article Views

7,185,346 Libertas Article Views

More Statistics

Abstract

Coalescent-based Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) inference generates estimates of evolutionary parameters and their posterior probability distributions. As the number of sequences increases, the length of time taken to complete an MCMC analysis increases as well. Here, we investigate an approach to distribute the MCMC analysis across a cluster of computers. To do this, we use bootstrapped topologies as fixed genealogies, perform a single MCMC analysis on each genealogy without topological rearrangements, and pool the results across all MCMC analyses. We show, through simulations, that although the standard MCMC performs better than the bootstrap-MCMC at estimating the effective population size (scaled by mutation rate), the bootstrap-MCMC returns better estimates of growth rates. Additionally, we find that our bootstrap-MCMC analyses are, on average, 37 times faster for equivalent effective sample sizes.


Post a Comment

x close

Discussion Add A Comment
No comments yet...Be the first to comment.


share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (Less Than 3 Weeks)
  • Fair & Comprehensive Peer Review
  • Professional Author Service
  • Leading Editors in Chief
  • Extensive Indexing
  • High Readership & Impact
  • What Your Colleagues Say

Quick Links

Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.

BROWSE CATEGORIES
Our Testimonials
I had a great experience publishing my case report in this journal. The submission to editorial decision time was very short, and in addition there were frequent updates by email regarding the status of the manuscript. I thought the editors were very friendly and supportive. I would recommend this journal to anyone wishing to publish his/her research in a quality journal with a decent article processing speed. I also appreciate the support given by the journal to authors from developing countries like me.
Dr Smith Giri (Tibhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal) What Your Colleagues Say