Close
Help
Need Help?
Search



Peer Reviewers

Submitting Your Peer Review

submit a paper

On this page → Writing Your Review • Submitting Your Review • Confirmation of Receipt of Review • Important Reminders •

We extend our thanks to individuals contributing peer reviews. In addition to this page all peer reviewers should ensure they are familiar with the guidance for peer reviewers and conflicts of interest pages.

We strongly recommend that you write your review 'offline' then login and submit it to us.  For security reasons My LA will automatically log you out after a period, so if you login then write your review in My LA your review may not be received.

Submit your review through our website using the login URL provided in our emails.  You do not need a My LA login and password for this.

Once you have logged in, click on "Article pending review" and then "Review".

Shortly after your review is received an email will be sent confirming receipt.  If you're uncertain whether you review was received please verify by email with your Libertas contact as soon as possible.

  • Please do not submit your peer review by email unless you have already attempted the procedure described here.

  • For reasons of confidentiality we cannot accept corrected or commented manuscripts from reviewers.

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
The reviewing and editorial management of our paper was timely, thorough, and systematic.  In particular the reviewers' comments resulted in a paper significantly more robust than the first version.
Dr Clark D Jeffries (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results