Close
Help
Need Help?
Search



Peer Reviewers

What Our Peer Reviewers Say

submit a paper

On this page →

Libertas regularly surveys contributors including peer reviewers to ensure we are meeting our high standards.  

Peer reviewers were recently surveyed and were asked to rate their experience in five areas as very good, good, fair, poor or very poor.

  • 93% rated instructions on how to undertake a peer review as good or very good

  • 90% rated their communication with Libertas staff as good or very good

  • 91% rated the accessibility of manuscript files as good or very good

  • 92% rated the interface to upload their peer review report as good or very good

  • 93% rated their over-all experience as a peer reviewer as good or very good

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
It is great pleasure to work as a peer reviewer for LA. The contact between us is fast and friendly. They have my highest recommendation and I look forward to working with them further.
Dr Jacek Kurzepa (Lublin, Poland)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results