Publication Date: 23 Mar 2011
Type: Review
Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics
Citation: Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics 2011:3 137-150
doi: 10.4137/CMT.S4015
The management of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) is a rapidly evolving field. New treatment paradigms are emerging due to an improved understanding of the host-viral interaction and the recent development of novel anti-viral therapies. Nevertheless, combination therapy with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribarivin (RBV) remains the cornerstone of the treatment of CHC and will likely remain so for the foreseeable future. Over the past decade treatment regimens involving peginterferon plus ribavirin therapy have evolved from initial fixed dosing schedules to more recent individualized response-guided schedules that utilize on-treatment virological responses to determine treatment duration. The future of CHC treatment in the near to medium term is likely to involve the use of PEG-IFN and RBV in conjunction with potent and specific direct acting anti-viral agents (DAA) (protease +/ polymerase inhibitors). This review will focus on the use of PEG-IFN and RBV in the treatment of CHC as well as provide insight into how DAA agents may be used with this therapy as we enter the era of specifically targeted antiviral therapy for HCV.
PDF (680.40 KB PDF FORMAT)
RIS citation (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)
BibTex citation (BIBDESK, LATEX)
I was pleased to serve as a peer reviewer for Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics. Its scope will hopefully blur some of the lines that still exist between clinical and basic science. The diligence of the editorial staff ensures the review process is fair, fast and very well-organized. I highly recommend potential authors and reviewers to submit to and review for this journal.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube