Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics

866,876 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin for Advanced Ovarian Cancer in Women who are Refractory to Both Platinum- and Paclitaxel-Based Chemotherapy Regimens

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 09 Sep 2009

Type: Review

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics

Citation: Clinical Medicine: Therapeutics 2009:1 1227-1236

Abstract

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is doxorubicin HCl encapsulated in long-circulating STEALTH® liposomes (Doxil®). PLD achieves good response rates and many patients maintain long-lasting stable disease (SD), which is one of the advantages. In addition, the clinical benefit is high in platinum-resistant disease, and PLD is thus considered to be the first option. PLD is associated with a number of adverse events, but these events are mild to moderate. PLD is safer for heavily pretreated patients than topotecan and gemcitabine due to mild bone-marrow toxicity, but that nonhematotoxity, such as PPE, stomatitis, mucositis, and other cutaneous reactions were the most common side effects attributable to PLD. Based on a review of previous studies, there are no differences in efficacy between 50 and 40 mg/m2 of PLD, therefore, a dose of 40 mg/m2 is preferable in patients with platinum-resistant disease to reduce adverse events. The 1-hour infusion schedule every 4 weeks makes PLD easy to administer. A rational approach to combine PLD with other drugs should take the slow accumulation and delayed peak of PLD in tumors into consideration. When combined with other useful agents, the lower dose of PLD (30 to 35 mg/m2) with a 3-week schedule may reduce severe PPE and stomatitis with negligible effects on the level of DI and the therapeutic efficacy.


Downloads

PDF  (967.66 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)




Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics
It's been a great experience publishing in Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics. I'm really impressed with the high quality, professional and constructive of peer review in the short time-frame. The editorial team is very helpful and I always received quick answers when I had questions. I am glad to have worked with Libertas Academica and I highly recommend publishing in Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics.
Dr Thanyanan Reungwetwattana (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results