Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes

140,075 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Pioglitazone in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: Safety and Efficacy Review

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 03 Aug 2010

Type: Review

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes

Citation: Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes 2010:3 43-51

doi: 10.4137/CMED.S5372

Abstract

The increase in obesity and the aging of the population has lead to an increase in the incidence of type 2 diabetes. This has led to the development of new drugs such as thiazolidinediones (TZDs) which are Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPAR- gamma) agonists, to treat type 2 diabetes. TZDs have recently been at the center of a controversy with regards to their cardiovascular safety. Pioglitazone is a TZD which has been shown to be effective in glycemic control by lowering insulin resistance. Pioglitazone also has beneficial effects on lipid metabolism and cardiovascular risk. The safety and efficacy of pioglitazone including its pleotropic effects are discussed at length in this article.


Downloads

PDF  (1.47 MB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML




Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes
I recommend highly Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes as it provides guidance in each step of the publication process. The peer review was also in high quality yet very constructive.
Dr Stanley Kim MD (Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results