Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Tobacco Use Insights

42,821 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Predictors of Clinician Tobacco Intervention Counseling in Six North Carolina Free Clinics

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 10 Jul 2012

Type: Original Research

Journal: Tobacco Use Insights

Citation: Tobacco Use Insights 2012:5 11-16

doi: 10.4137/TUI.S9350

Abstract

While the poor and the uninsured are at increased risk for tobacco use, up to two thirds of these patients express interest in near-term quitting. Nonetheless, tobacco counseling rates remain low in clinics serving these patients. As part of a larger tobacco intervention project in North Carolina free clinics, we gathered baseline data on patient characteristics in six randomly selected facilities affiliated with the North Carolina Association of Free Clinics. An exit interview was completed by 231 patients; 126 (54%) were tobacco users. Among all patients, 71% had been asked by a clinician about tobacco use in the past 3 months. Among tobacco users, 68% had received at least one other counseling step (assessment; advice; or assistance). Patients with asthma and current tobacco users had a two-fold increase in being asked about tobacco use. Patients’ diagnoses—in particular asthma—can remind clinicians of tobacco intervention.


Downloads

PDF  (574.00 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)




Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
Libertas Academica really cares about authors of submitted papers.  Its policy guarantees that every submitted paper will receive responsible and professional review comments.
Dr Hao Yu (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results