Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Women's Health

75,469 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Reducing Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: Safety and Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 26 Apr 2012

Type: Review

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Women's Health

Citation:

doi: 10.4137/CMWH.S6314

Abstract

Menorrhagia or Heavy Menstrual Bleeding (HMB) remains a public health challenge among women in the reproductive age group. Anti-fibrinolytics such as tranexamic acid and epsilon aminocaproic acid, play an important role in the medical management of HMB, as HMB is associated with an increase in local fibrinolysis. Lysteda is a novel oral formulation of tranexamic acid which has recently been approved by the US FDA for treatment of HMB. Efficacy of tranexamic acid in the general gynecologic population as well as in women with bleeding disorders is discussed in this review. Safety and adverse effect profile is also addressed for both these populations.


Downloads

PDF  (450.96 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)




Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
It was a pleasure to publish in Immunology and Immunogenetics Insights.  The review process was prompt and efficient with useful feedback.  The author interface was user-friendly and effective.  It was a great experience to work with Libertas Academica.
Dr Mena Soory (King's College London, UK)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results