Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Geriatrics

95,165 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Review of Tools and Technologies to Assess Multi-System Functional Impairment and Frailty

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 20 Mar 2009

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Geriatrics

Citation: Clinical Medicine: Geriatrics 2009:3 1-8

Abstract

The term ‘frailty’ has often been used—by clinicians and researchers alike—to characterize the most vulnerable and weak amongst the elderly. The treatment and care of this subgroup of older individuals presents the most challenge to clinicians and other health care professionals. Although there is no clear consensus on the issue of definition of frailty, most definitions emphasize the multi-system functional impairment and increased vulnerability to stressors. In order to intervene early and reverse or delay the decline in functional (physical and mental) capacity, it is of utmost importance to diagnose and objectively quantify the degree of functional deficit. This article aims to take an holistic approach by reviewing current and emerging tools and technologies available to assess multi-system functional impairment in older adults. Several widely-used indices of frailty, tests of physical function, and questionnaires to assess quality of daily life, nutritional status and mental and emotional functioning in older adults will be discussed in brief. Finally one emerging technology, accelerometry, which may enable the early diagnosis of loss of functional capacity as well as provide the ability to objectively quantify the degree of deficit in both clinical and non-clinical environments, will be described.


Downloads

PDF  (207.02 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)




Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
I was delighted to submit an invited review on cluster headache pharmacology.  As someone who writes a few papers per year on these subjects, I appreciated that the submission, review and approval process for the paper was smooth and efficient. Our reviewers raised important points that improved the overall quality of the manuscript. Overall a very positive experience.
Dr Michael J. Marmura (Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results