Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Biomedical Engineering and Computational Biology

36,793 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Support Vector Machine Based Classification Model for Screening Plasmodium falciparum Proliferation Inhibitors and Non-Inhibitors

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 07 Jul 2011

Type: Methodology

Journal: Biomedical Engineering and Computational Biology

Citation: Biomedical Engineering and Computational Biology 2011:3 13-24

doi: 10.4137/BECB.S7503

Abstract

There is an urgent need to develop novel anti-malarials in view of the increasing disease burden and growing resistance of the currently used drugs against the malarial parasites. Proliferation inhibitors targeting P. falciparum intraerythrocytic cycle are one of the important classes of compounds being explored for its potential to be novel anti-malarials. Support Vector Machine (SVM) based model developed by us can facilitate rapid screening of large and diverse chemical libraries by reducing false hits and prioritising compounds before setting up expensive High Throughput Screening experiment. The SVM model, trained with molecular descriptors of proliferation inhibitors and non-inhibitors, displayed a satisfactory performance on cross validations and independent data set, with an average accuracy of 83% and AUC of 0.88. Intriguingly, the method displayed remarkable accuracy for the recently submitted P. falciparum whole cell screening datasets. The method also predicted several inhibitors in the National Cancer Institute diversity set, mostly similar to the known inhibitors.


Downloads

PDF  (1.16 MB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

Supplementary Files 1  (115.25 KB ZIP FORMAT)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)




Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
Biomarkers in Cancer was prompt, focused and straight forward during the process. Guidance was available throughout the process. This has been one of the most enjoyable experiences in dealing with the staff of a journal publishing good quality science. It's amazing that one day you submit corrections and the next day you receive corrected proofs. And the process continues until you are completely satisfied. Amazing. The peer review process matched the standard of any international ...
Dr Faiz Nasim (Professor of Biochemistry, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results