Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology

605,280 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Systemic Therapy for Elderly Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 25 Apr 2011

Type: Review

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology

Citation: Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology 2011:5 89-99

doi: 10.4137/CMO.S6983

Abstract

The majority of patients with gastrointestinal cancers are over the age of 65. This age group comprises the minority of the patients enrolled in clinical trials, and it is unknown whether older patients achieve similar results as younger patients in terms of survival benefit and tolerability. In addition, there are few studies specifically designed for patients over 65 years. Subset analyses of individual trials and studies using pooled patient data from multiple trials provide some understanding on outcomes in older patients with gastrointestinal cancers. This article reviews the evidence on chemotherapeutic regimens in the elderly with colorectal, pancreatic, and gastroesophageal cancers, and discusses a practical approach to provide the best outcomes for older patients.


Downloads

PDF  (564.12 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML




Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology
testimonial_image
The team at Libertas Academica stands above the pack as publishers of academic journals.  My recent article in Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology was handled very professionally throughout the process.  They have my highest regards. 
Dr Jimmy T Efird (East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results