Publication Date: 25 Aug 2009
Type: Review
Journal: Immunotherapy Insights
Citation: Immunotherapy Insights 2009:1 3-14
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated malignancies offer a unique model to develop T cell-based immune therapies, targeting viral antigens expressed on tumor cells. Throughout the last 15 years, EBV-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTL) have been successfully employed for the prophylaxis and treatment of EBV-related lymphoproliferative disorders (LPD) in immunocompromised hosts, particularly after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. More recently, their use has been extended to treat LPD developing after solid organ transplantation. The favourable experience with LPD has raised interest in applying this therapeutic strategy to other EBV-positive malignancies. Although the preliminary results of T-cell therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma or nasopharyngeal carcinoma have shown the potential for reaching objective responses in patients with advanced-stage cancer, EBV-specific CTLs demonstrated lower efficacy in the treatment of virus-related neoplasia in the immunocompetent host. Thus, further improvements to the protocols employed in the transplantation setting are clearly necessary to increase anti-tumor activity. Promising implementations are underway, including harnessing the therapeutic potential of CTLs specific for subdominant EBV latent cycle epitopes, and delineating strategies aimed at targeting immune evasion mechanisms exerted by tumor cells.
PDF (616.60 KB PDF FORMAT)
RIS citation (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)
BibTex citation (BIBDESK, LATEX)
I would like to express my appreciation to Libertas Academica. The editorial staff are helpful and friendly, the reviews are prompt and professional, and final publication is rapid. I recommend publishing in Libertas Academica journals.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube