Close
Help
Need Help?



What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
Our Testimonials
Author Survey Results Journal Testimonials

As an author of a review published in Translational Oncogenomics, I was impressed by the prompt processing and speed of publication. The entire submission, review and publication process was easy, quick and pleasant. The comments from reviewers and associate editor were high quality, scientifically deep and objective. It was a great pleasure to cooperate with such qualified and friendly team. I highly recommend publication in Libertas Academica journals.


- Dr Joseph Zaretsky
(Tel Aviv University, Israel)
testimonial_image

Compared with other journals we considered for publishing, Cancer Informatics provided extremely rapid but quality turnaround from draft submission to a flawlessly typeset final publication.  Moreover, sharing the article is now as easy as sharing a link with no subscriptions required, and additional code and data files are equally accessible, supporting reproducible research.  Because it has published many of our references we feel confident that our target readership must follow the journal.  This is further evidenced by the steadily growing number of views that are kindly provided as follow-up. A good combination of advantages with efficient and professional execution!


- Dr Seppo Karrila
(Prince of Songkla University, Thailand)

It is an absolute pleasure serving as a peer reviewer for Libertas Academia. The review process was efficient and easy to navigate.  I am looking forward to peer reviewing additional articles in the future.


- Dr Samuel S. Grossman PharmD, CDE
(New York Harbor Health Care System, New York, NY, USA)
testimonial_image

I had a great experience publishing our paper in Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology. The review was prompt and fair and once it was accepted with the revisions, the editorial office was very clear and helpful with updates on the progress at each step of the publication process.  I had prompt email responses to my questions.  I will definitely try to publish more papers in this journal in the future.  Keep up the good work.


- Dr Jan Moreb
(University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA)

I would like to say that this is the most author-friendly editing process I have experienced. The publishing process of this journal was a most pleasant and productive experience, and it was fast and convenient to me.


- Dr Zhiming Zhang
(Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan, P.R. China)
testimonial_image

My experience publishing in 'Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology' was excellent.  I was impressed with the quick review and proof-read processes.  The electronic submission website is user friendly, and the continuous manuscript status updates received from the journal were helpful in tracking the progress of the paper.


- Dr Tallal Younis
(Dalhousie Unversity, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada)

The publication of our paper in Bioinformatics and Biology Insights was highly professional and very pleasant on all levels: the guidelines for authors are concise, the online submission system is user-friendly, the comments from the reviewers were insightful and improved our paper, and the preparation of the manuscript for publication was efficient. I particularly liked the fast feedback from the staff on the state of the submission and review process.


- Professor Werner Braun
(Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Sealy Center for Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA)
testimonial_image

My submission to Libertas was one of the easiest and most time-efficient publication processes I have come across.  From the quick response of the reviewers to the rapid return of the proofs, I was amazed at how quickly my article was "publication ready"!  Thanks for such a painless publication process.


- Dr Gerald W Dryden
(University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA)

I experienced rapid and fair peer review and fast article publication. The competent editorial and production staff at Libertas Academica were attentive to every detail and were great at communicating with us during the review and publication process. Thank you for your great service.


- Dr Geetanjali Gupta
(Department of Pathology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India)
testimonial_image

I consider that working with you has been the most interesting and friendly process I have experienced publishing.  The staff have been very supportive to me, quickly addressing every concern I had.  The whole process from the arrival of manuscript to the publication is the fastest I´ve ever experienced, and is very convenient for authors.  The staff kept us informed about the whole rigorous process step by step which is a great advantage for us.

I would strongly recommend Libertas Academica for academic publishing.


- Professor Esther Uña Cidón
(Professor of Oncology/Palliative Medicine, Oncology Department, Clinical University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine of Valladolid, Spain)

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
testimonial_image
I had a great experience publishing our paper in Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology. The review was prompt and fair and once it was accepted with the revisions, the editorial office was very clear and helpful with updates on the progress at each step of the publication process.  I had prompt email responses to my questions.  I will definitely try to publish more papers in this journal in the future.  Keep the good work. ...
Dr Jan Moreb (University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results