I have published more than thirty research papers in internationally reputed high impact factor journals including Libertas Academica publications, Proteomics Insights and Analytical Chemistry Insights. I have no hesitation in saying that Proteomics Insights is highly efficient for its rapid and high quality review process and keeping the authors informed at each stage of the publication process. I recommend this journal for students, teachers and research workers who wish to publish their work.
I enjoyed doing the recent peer review and after reading the article felt that I was witnessing a new way of thinking and examining issues. Thank you for allowing me to be a part of this exciting venture into discovery.
I was delighted with the speed and efficiency with which my paper was processed. The friendly and personal communications with editorial staff also made the experience extremely pleasant and easy. I should be happy to recommend International Journal of Tryptophan Research to anyone.
Publishing with Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes was a great experience. The editors were prompt in updating me with information regarding the status of the manuscript, and answering all questions I had during the publication process. I was pleased with how little time it took from submission to publication.
Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports was very thorough. I appreciated the way you painstakingly followed all the processes of verifying submitted manuscripts for publication. It shows that you do not just allow anything to pass for publication! Please keep the good work. Science and indeed biological research should be verifiable and dynamic.
Since my first enquiry about publishing in Gene Regulation And Systems Biology until the last moment of completing all the steps for publishing my paper, I was always taken seriously as author. All my questions and concerns were answered in a very professional way. The review process was quick and very fair. Reviewers stick to the facts and declare their points of view like a clear thread through the manuscript. I always had an enthusiastic feeling working with the people that serve for the journal. I strongly recommend the Journal to my colleges in the field and wish a brilliant future for the Gene Regulation and Systems Biology.
My experience with the review stages and manuscript processing in Cancer Growth and Metastasis has been of excellence. The fine balance of times utilized for proper scientific assessment of the material and quality control is greatly commended.
The team at Evolutionary Bioinformatics were fantastic in everyway. They were very accesible and helped with all aspects of getting the paper published in a timely fashion. The immediate online help option avaliable through the website is a great option.
Biomarkers in Cancer was prompt, focused and straight forward during the process. Guidance was available throughout the process. This has been one of the most enjoyable experiences in dealing with the staff of a journal publishing good quality science. It's amazing that one day you submit corrections and the next day you receive corrected proofs. And the process continues until you are completely satisfied. Amazing. The peer review process matched the standard of any international science journal. The reviewers' comments helped to improve the quality of the manuscript.
It was a pleasure and honor to be a peer reviewer for Libertas Academica. The review process is extremely streamlined and seems effortless; at the same time yielding high quality material. Great balance.
I have had contact with Drug Target Insights several times, and every time I am impressed by the handling of the manuscript. The website is very, very user-friendly. It is easy to submit a manuscript. The entire process is easy and straightforward. The corresponding author is kept updated on the progress at every point. The editors of Libertas were helpful and prompt in responding to questions and issues related to the submission I am pleased ...
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)