I have thoroughly enjoyed my participation as a reviewer for Nutrition and Metabolic Insights. I am impressed by the quality of manuscripts submitted for consideration from all over the world. The online review submission process is very well organized and simple to use.
This is the first time we published an article in Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment, and we were pleased to find that the publishing staff were extremely helpful in guiding our submission through all the hoops. More important they answered our concerns without delay and where necessary made changes in the page proofs in accord with our wishes.
I have published upwards of 80 or 90 articles, chapters and edited volumes, and I have never worked with a publishing staff who were as responsive as the staff of SART. At first, we wondered how fast a team of editors half a globe away were going to receive our edits and act on them – the answer was “immediately.” They must never sleep down under.
I would like to say that this is the most author-friendly editing process I have experienced in over 50 publications. The publishing process of this journal was a most pleasant and productive experience. I was particularly impressed with the regular updates of the progress of my submission. My experience with Libertas Academica was excellent.
My experience in publishing our manuscript in Environmental Health Insights was positive. The speed of processing was the fastest of all the journals I have encountered. The peer review and editorial comments were to-the-point and professional. The open reader access greatly enhances article visibility. I would publish again in this journal if I have suitable studies to publish.
Publishing with Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes was a great experience. The editors were prompt in updating me with information regarding the status of the manuscript, and answering all questions I had during the publication process. I was pleased with how little time it took from submission to publication.
Working with the editorial staff and reviewers for Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics was a positive experience. The online submission/revision process was easy and staff were readily available to answer any questions. Reviewers were knowledgeable, lending expert comments that allowed for improvement in content information. I highly recommend others practitioners and researchers to consider Libertas Academica journals for their next publication.
I was pleased to serve as a peer reviewer for Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics. Its scope will hopefully blur some of the lines that still exist between clinical and basic science. The diligence of the editorial staff ensures the review process is fair, fast and very well-organized. I highly recommend potential authors and reviewers to submit to and review for this journal.
This is the most author-friendly editing process I have experienced. The publishing process of this journal was a most pleasant and productive experience and it was fast and convenient.
The team at Libertas Academica stands above the pack as publishers of academic journals. My recent article in Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology was handled very professionally throughout the process. They have my highest regards.
My experience with Libertas Academica was very positive from submission to acceptance. The reviewers' comments were very interesting and constructive. The author interface was user-friendly and very effective. The publishing process was fast and convenient. I recommend this journal.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)