We are delighted about the speedy and professional process.
Recently we published a paper describing cloning of a new kinase gene, MLK4, in Genomics Insights.
I was impressed by the prompt processing and speed of publication. The comments from the reviewers allowed me to improve the paper significantly. The reviews were scientifically deep and objective, which is very valuable because in many journals decisions to publish or not to publish are very unfair and subjective.
I highly recommend that other researchers publish their papers in Genomics Insights.
I was pleased to serve as a peer reviewer for Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics. Its scope will hopefully blur some of the lines that still exist between clinical and basic science. The diligence of the editorial staff ensures the review process is fair, fast and very well-organized. I highly recommend potential authors and reviewers to submit to and review for this journal.
My personal observation about LA is that our paper was critically peer reviewed for a constructive, speedy and high quality manner. Our research paper from a different perspective of built environment in manifestation of diabetes was received by peer reviewers very positively and constructively. We are highly satisfied.
I very much enjoyed the experience of publishing with Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment. The editorial and review staff were very helpful and understanding throughout, even when a very large and complex project was being undertaken, and a range of subjects had to be reviewed. The editor was sympathetic and understanding of the author's responses, and this combined and coordinated interplay has allowed major conceptual advances to be made with major implications for the improvement of patient treatment.
It is a great pleasure for me to be a peer reviewer for Libertas Academica. The review process is efficient, well organized, and user friendly. I encourage others to be a part of this team as an author or a peer reviewer/editor. Thanks Libertas Academica editors and editorial management for maintaining this high level of quality and for their professionalism.
I would like to extend my gratitude for creating the next generation of a scientific journal -- the science journal of tomorrow. The entire process bespoke of exceptional efficiency, celerity, professionalism, competency, and service.
Our experience publishing in Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology was the easiest and most user-friendly interface we have encountered. The staff were very attentive to us and kept us posted at every step of the process. It was rewarding to have our article appear in press within weeks, compared to months at other journals.
The staff of Libertas Academica have been exceptionally easy to work with. They continually keep authors updated and are responsive to all requests. They were also very flexible to work with when I had some challenges from my end as an author. Article reviews were received very promptly and were constructive and helpful for improving the manuscript. The online submission system was easy to use and provided clear guidance on what was needed. I highly recommend Libertas Academica and their excellent team.
The submission process for publication in Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports is extremely smooth. The editors were very fast in their response and provided detailed instructions about all procedures. They were happy to answer to all our questions. The whole process was fast and efficient. Congratulations to Libertas Academica.
The staff of Libertas Academica have been exceptionally easy to work with. They continually keep authors updated and are responsive to all requests. They were also very flexible to work with when I had some challenges from my end as an author. Article reviews were received very promptly and were constructive and helpful for improving the manuscript. The online submission system was easy to use and provided clear guidance on what was needed. I highly ...
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)