I was delighted to submit an invited review on cluster headache pharmacology. As someone who writes a few papers per year on these subjects, I appreciated that the submission, review and approval process for the paper was smooth and efficient. Our reviewers raised important points that improved the overall quality of the manuscript. Overall a very positive experience.
It was a pleasure working with LA. The review process is fast and I strongly recommend the authors to consider LA to publish their valuable data.
The team at Libertas Academica stands above the pack as publishers of academic journals. My recent article in Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology was handled very professionally throughout the process. They have my highest regards.
Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports was very thorough. I appreciated the way you painstakingly followed all the processes of verifying submitted manuscripts for publication. It shows that you do not just allow anything to pass for publication! Please keep the good work. Science and indeed biological research should be verifiable and dynamic.
Publishing in Air, Soil and Water and Water Research was the best experience I have had so far in an academic context. The review process was fair, quick and efficient. I congratulate the team at Libertas Academica for a very well managed journal.
I enjoyed doing the recent peer review and after reading the article felt that I was witnessing a new way of thinking and examining issues. Thank you for allowing me to be a part of this exciting venture into discovery.
I would like to extend my gratitude for creating the next generation of a scientific journal -- the science journal of tomorrow. The entire process bespoke of exceptional efficiency, celerity, professionalism, competency, and service.
Our experience publishing in Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology was the easiest and most user-friendly interface we have encountered. The staff were very attentive to us and kept us posted at every step of the process. It was rewarding to have our article appear in press within weeks, compared to months at other journals.
I found that publishing my paper in Signal Transduction Insights was a very satisfying experience. The submission process was simple, review rapid and thorough and the appearance of the article was first rate. I recommend this journal.
I was pleased to serve as a peer reviewer for Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics. Its scope will hopefully blur some of the lines that still exist between clinical and basic science. The diligence of the editorial staff ensures the review process is fair, fast and very well-organized. I highly recommend potential authors and reviewers to submit to and review for this journal.
I thank Libertas for the guidance, speed and encouragement they provided from my first submission until publication. I appreciate the patience and support of everyone I communicated with. Your services are user-friendly. I intend to submit more articles to your journals.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)