Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports was very thorough. I appreciated the way you painstakingly followed all the processes of verifying submitted manuscripts for publication. It shows that you do not just allow anything to pass for publication! Please keep the good work. Science and indeed biological research should be verifiable and dynamic.
My laboratory has published several papers in Cell Communication Insights. In each case, reviewer comments were returned promptly; the suggested revisions were both fair and quite helpful, reflecting positively on the quality of the review. Once accepted, the editorial office provided clear and frequent updates on the progress of our manuscripts through each step of the publication process. When necessary, I had prompt email responses to my questions and the figure quality was exceptional. Keep up the outstanding work.
Recently we published a paper describing cloning of a new kinase gene, MLK4, in Genomics Insights.
I was impressed by the prompt processing and speed of publication. The comments from the reviewers allowed me to improve the paper significantly. The reviews were scientifically deep and objective, which is very valuable because in many journals decisions to publish or not to publish are very unfair and subjective. I highly recommend that other researchers publish their papers in Genomics Insights.
I would like to express my appreciation to Libertas Academica. The editorial staff are helpful and friendly, the reviews are prompt and professional, and final publication is rapid. I recommend publishing in Libertas Academica journals.
I am definitely impressed by the manner with which Libertas Academica handled the publication of our research paper. The prompt reviews and other processes involved is a credit to the competence and experience of staff of Libertas Academica. Most outstanding is the friendly communications from the staff which kept us informed all the way through, providing guidance on our submission as it passed through a most rigorous peer review.
I would recommend Libertas Academica for any serious academic publishing.
I had an excellent experience publishing our review article in Clinical Medicine Reviews. The managing editor was very helpful and the process was very timely and transparent.
The publication of our paper in Bioinformatics and Biology Insights was highly professional and very pleasant on all levels: the guidelines for authors are concise, the online submission system is user-friendly, the comments from the reviewers were insightful and improved our paper, and the preparation of the manuscript for publication was efficient. I particularly liked the fast feedback from the staff on the state of the submission and review process.
I experienced rapid and fair peer review and fast article publication. The competent editorial and production staff at Libertas Academica were attentive to every detail and were great at communicating with us during the review and publication process. Thank you for your great service.
This is the first time I have published in Genetics and Epigenetics and it was easy and efficient. The peer reviews took less time than I supposed they would. The remarks were appropriate and made by qualified peer reviewers. All paths from submission to publication were easy, rapid and understandable. I was impressed by the professionalism and punctuality of peer reviewers, Editor in Chief and all staff members of this journal. Keep up the good work!
It was a pleasure working with LA. The review process is fast and I strongly recommend the authors to consider LA to publish their valuable data.
This is the second time I have submitted a paper to Palliative Care: Research and Treatment for possible publication. In both instances, my experience with Libertas Academica was very good from submission to acceptance. The peer reviewers' comments were insightful, very constructive, and extremely helpful. The author interface was user-friendly. The publishing process was fast and convenient. I highly recommend this journal.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)