The process of submission and publishing was a great experience. During the few weeks from the submission to publication I have worked with high quality staff. In my opinion, the easy communication was the most important characteristic of Libertas and an important influence on the final quality of the article. I definitely recommend the publisher to my colleagues.
This is the first time I have published published an article in Clinical Medicine Insights Case Report. I was pleased to find that the publishing staff were helpful in guiding my submission and I was impressed by the prompt processing and speed of publication.
Recently we published a paper describing cloning of a new kinase gene, MLK4, in Genomics Insights.
I was impressed by the prompt processing and speed of publication. The comments from the reviewers allowed me to improve the paper significantly. The reviews were scientifically deep and objective, which is very valuable because in many journals decisions to publish or not to publish are very unfair and subjective.
I highly recommend that other researchers publish their papers in Genomics Insights.
The submission process for publication in Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports is extremely smooth. The editors were very fast in their response and provided detailed instructions about all procedures. They were happy to answer to all our questions. The whole process was fast and efficient. Congratulations to Libertas Academica.
Publishing in “Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology” was one of my best experience so far in an academic context. I found the process of going through submission, review, editing, and publication to be quite easy and most importantly, fair and efficient. I congratulate the team at Libertas Academica for a very well managed journal.
We have had a fantastic and unprecedented experience publishing our paper in Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology. The process of submitting and correcting the proofs were simple, quick, and smooth. We appreciated the clarity and easiness of instructions and your fast responses to our emails. Great work. Keep it up.
The process of submitting the paper was smooth with little time required on the author's behalf. Reviews were prompt and the process of addressing reviewer comments was very streamlined. All correspondence with the editorial office was extremely professional with immediate responses. This is one of the few journals asking for feedback on their submission process.
It has been great pleasure to work with Libertas Academica and the communications between us have always been fast and efficient. I am looking forward to working with Libertas Academica more and more!
I was delighted to submit an invited review on cluster headache pharmacology. As someone who writes a few papers per year on these subjects, I appreciated that the submission, review and approval process for the paper was smooth and efficient. Our reviewers raised important points that improved the overall quality of the manuscript. Overall a very positive experience.
We have had a great experience publishing our paper in Nutrition & Metabolic Insights. The peer review process was rigorous and the journal staff were very helpful with proof processing. We will definitely be submitting future manuscripts to this journal. Keep up the good work!!
My recent paper in Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics was the third I have published in a Libertas Academica journal. Again, I was very pleased by the remarkable speed of publication. It took less than seven weeks from submission of the first manuscript version and two weeks from submission of the revision to the appearance of the final article. When I had unforeseen problems with the transmission of proof corrections because of some software incompatibilities the ...
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)