I thank Libertas for the guidance, speed and encouragement they provided from my first submission until publication. I appreciate the patience and support of everyone I communicated with. Your services are user-friendly. I intend to submit more articles to your journals.
It is my pleasure to confirm that we had a very pleasant experience by publishing our article in Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics. The review process was highly efficient and the reviewers' comments useful and constructive. I am sure that this is the kind of publication needed by the scientific community. I am looking forward future collaborations.
I would like to thank the staff of Libertas Academica for their assistance in the publication process. From the first e-mail to the final approval, each member of the staff has been friendly, helpful, and professional. The whole process was seamless without any delays in processing of the manuscript. I look forward to working with Libertas Academica again.
This is the first time I have published in Genetics and Epigenetics and it was easy and efficient. The peer reviews took less time than I supposed they would. The remarks were appropriate and made by qualified peer reviewers. All paths from submission to publication were easy, rapid and understandable. I was impressed by the professionalism and punctuality of peer reviewers, Editor in Chief and all staff members of this journal. Keep up the good work!
Working with the editorial staff and reviewers for Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics was a positive experience. The online submission/revision process was easy and staff were readily available to answer any questions. Reviewers were knowledgeable, lending expert comments that allowed for improvement in content information. I highly recommend others practitioners and researchers to consider Libertas Academica journals for their next publication.
I highly recommend publication in Libertas Academia journals. The entire submission, review and publication process for our article in Clinical Medicine Insights: Dermatology was easy and quick. The reviews were very professional and helpful and the publication fees were reasonable. We also appreciate that our article is available online free of charge to anyone interested in it.
I am very pleased that I submitted my manuscript to Environmental Health Insights. The submission, review and publication were quick and fair. I hope to submit further papers to the journal. Thank you very much.
I had a great experience publishing my case report in this journal. The submission to editorial decision time was very short, and in addition there were frequent updates by email regarding the status of the manuscript. I thought the editors were very friendly and supportive. I would recommend this journal to anyone wishing to publish his/her research in a quality journal with a decent article processing speed. I also appreciate the support given by the journal to authors from developing countries like me.
My experience in publishing our manuscript in Environmental Health Insights was positive. The speed of processing was the fastest of all the journals I have encountered. The peer review and editorial comments were to-the-point and professional. The open reader access greatly enhances article visibility. I would publish again in this journal if I have suitable studies to publish.
I was requested to contribute a review. The objectives, timelines and process were all extremely reasonable and fit in well with my knowledge base and my work as well as my schedule. The process was quite seamless and no paper was ever exchanged--everything was completed on-line. Thanks for the opportunity to make this contribution.
My experience publishing in 'Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology' was excellent. I was impressed with the quick review and proof-read processes. The electronic submission website is user friendly, and the continuous manuscript status updates received from the journal were helpful in tracking the progress of the paper.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)