My experience publishing in Human Parasitic Diseases was very positive. I was very satisfied with the rapid and high-quality review process and the constructive feedback. The comments from the reviewers allowed me to improve the paper significantly. I highly recommend that other researchers publish their papers in Libertas Academia Journals.
I very much enjoyed the experience of publishing with Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment. The editorial and review staff were very helpful and understanding throughout, even when a very large and complex project was being undertaken, and a range of subjects had to be reviewed. The editor was sympathetic and understanding of the author's responses, and this combined and coordinated interplay has allowed major conceptual advances to be made with major implications for the improvement of patient treatment.
Recently we published a paper describing cloning of a new kinase gene, MLK4, in Genomics Insights.
I was impressed by the prompt processing and speed of publication. The comments from the reviewers allowed me to improve the paper significantly. The reviews were scientifically deep and objective, which is very valuable because in many journals decisions to publish or not to publish are very unfair and subjective.
I highly recommend that other researchers publish their papers in Genomics Insights.
I had an excellent experience publishing our review article in Clinical Medicine Reviews. The managing editor was very helpful and the process was very timely and transparent.
It was a pleasure participating as a reviewer for Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports. The online access was smooth and very user-friendly. The navigation process for submission of reviewer comments was flawless.
Overall, a very pleasant process. The case report that I reviewed was a very interesting one, very well written and with many interesting points for readers.
My experience with Libertas Academica was very positive from submission to acceptance. The reviewers' comments were very interesting and constructive. The author interface was user-friendly and very effective. The publishing process was fast and convenient. I recommend this journal.
Submitting a manuscript to LA was the most straightforward manuscript submission process that I have ever experienced. Review was fast, and the quality of the reviews was excellent. I highly recommend this publisher and would not hesitate to submit to them again.
I truly enjoyed the publishing process with Libertas Academica. The staff were professional, friendly, and efficient. They are good at what they do and I look forward to working with them again for my next paper.
The publication of our paper in Bioinformatics and Biology Insights was highly professional and very pleasant on all levels: the guidelines for authors are concise, the online submission system is user-friendly, the comments from the reviewers were insightful and improved our paper, and the preparation of the manuscript for publication was efficient. I particularly liked the fast feedback from the staff on the state of the submission and review process.
I would like to thank the staff of Libertas Academica for their assistance in the publication process. From the first e-mail to the final approval, each member of the staff has been friendly, helpful, and professional. The whole process was seamless without any delays in processing of the manuscript. I look forward to working with Libertas Academica again.
I consider that working with you has been the most interesting and friendly process I have experienced publishing. The staff have been very supportive to me, quickly addressing every concern I had. The whole process from the arrival of manuscript to the publication is the fastest I´ve ever experienced, and is very convenient for authors. The staff kept us informed about the whole rigorous process step by step which is a great advantage for us.I ...
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)