I am very impressed with the professional editorial team at Libertas Academica. They have my highest recommendation.
I am very pleased that I submitted my manuscript to Environmental Health Insights. The submission, review and publication were quick and fair. I hope to submit further papers to the journal. Thank you very much.
I very much enjoyed the experience of publishing with Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment. The editorial and review staff were very helpful and understanding throughout, even when a very large and complex project was being undertaken, and a range of subjects had to be reviewed. The editor was sympathetic and understanding of the author's responses, and this combined and coordinated interplay has allowed major conceptual advances to be made with major implications for the improvement of patient treatment.
I had a great experience publishing my case report in this journal. The submission to editorial decision time was very short, and in addition there were frequent updates by email regarding the status of the manuscript. I thought the editors were very friendly and supportive. I would recommend this journal to anyone wishing to publish his/her research in a quality journal with a decent article processing speed. I also appreciate the support given by the journal to authors from developing countries like me.
I have published more than thirty research papers in internationally reputed high impact factor journals including Libertas Academica publications, Proteomics Insights and Analytical Chemistry Insights. I have no hesitation in saying that Proteomics Insights is highly efficient for its rapid and high quality review process and keeping the authors informed at each stage of the publication process. I recommend this journal for students, teachers and research workers who wish to publish their work.
I would like to congratulate Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes for the professional way it manages the entire publication process. I am certain it will have a bright future, and reach top positions among endocrine and metabolic journals.
The team at Libertas Academica stands above the pack as publishers of academic journals. My recent article in Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology was handled very professionally throughout the process. They have my highest regards.
I would like to express my gratitude and say that publishing in LA's journals is one of the best experiences I have had. I will certainly continue with LA's journals in the future. the unique feature of this publisher is that it provides a research platform for all young researchers. Thank you for providing a sustainable publishing environment for us.
Recently we published a paper describing cloning of a new kinase gene, MLK4, in Genomics Insights.
I was impressed by the prompt processing and speed of publication. The comments from the reviewers allowed me to improve the paper significantly. The reviews were scientifically deep and objective, which is very valuable because in many journals decisions to publish or not to publish are very unfair and subjective. I highly recommend that other researchers publish their papers in Genomics Insights.
It was a pleasure and honor to be a peer reviewer for Libertas Academica. The review process is extremely streamlined and seems effortless; at the same time yielding high quality material. Great balance.
My recent paper in Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics was the third I have published in a Libertas Academica journal. Again, I was very pleased by the remarkable speed of publication. It took less than seven weeks from submission of the first manuscript version and two weeks from submission of the revision to the appearance of the final article. When I had unforeseen problems with the transmission of proof corrections because of some software incompatibilities the ...
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)