I would like to thank the staff of Libertas Academica for their assistance in the publication process. From the first e-mail to the final approval, each member of the staff has been friendly, helpful, and professional. The whole process was seamless without any delays in processing of the manuscript. I look forward to working with Libertas Academica again.
I find Ophthalmology and Eye Diseases very author-friendly. As a first time author publishing in this journal I experienced close attention to authors, prompt and close co-operation in all phases of production of my manuscript encouraging. Your excellent staff simplified a daunting process that often makes authors just give up on publication due to unwarranted and irrational complexities, with close guidance to produce high quality work.
Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports was very thorough. I appreciated the way you painstakingly followed all the processes of verifying submitted manuscripts for publication. It shows that you do not just allow anything to pass for publication! Please keep the good work. Science and indeed biological research should be verifiable and dynamic.
Submitting a manuscript to LA was the most straightforward manuscript submission process that I have ever experienced. Review was fast, and the quality of the reviews was excellent. I highly recommend this publisher and would not hesitate to submit to them again.
It has been a great experience serving as a peer reviewer for Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology. The guidelines for the reviewers are concise, the online system is user-friendly and the editorial staff are very diligent and professional. I look forward to further collaboration with Libertas and also highly recommend potential authors to submit their work to journals published by LA.
As a peer reviewer for Environmental Health Insights, I have had the opportunity to read several very important research articles in my field. Based on my experience, the submission process, review standards, and publication expectations are rigorous and demanding as other high impact journals. I look forward to further reviewing papers for Environmental Health Insights and learning from my peers and other leaders in the field.
This is the fastest progress we have experienced from submission to acceptance. Reviews are fast, pertinent, and instructive. Every step of the process is visible and prompt, and every email is friendly and immediate. In all, it is an excellent experience to be published in Libertas Academica.
The team at Evolutionary Bioinformatics were fantastic in everyway. They were very accesible and helped with all aspects of getting the paper published in a timely fashion. The immediate online help option avaliable through the website is a great option.
I have thoroughly enjoyed my participation as a reviewer for Nutrition and Metabolic Insights. I am impressed by the quality of manuscripts submitted for consideration from all over the world. The online review submission process is very well organized and simple to use.
I have had nothing but positive experiences publishing with Libertas Academica. The publication procedure is as quick and smooth as any I've encountered, and the peer review process is sufficiently rigorous that the reader can have complete confidence in the content of its journals.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)