Publishing with Libertas Academia was a positive experience. The reviewers provided well thought out and prompt feedback which contributed to the quality of the final product. In addition, editing went quickly and smoothly. All correspondence was met by quick responses. I was impressed by the overall simplicity of the entire process.
Recently we published a paper describing cloning of a new kinase gene, MLK4, in Genomics Insights.
I was impressed by the prompt processing and speed of publication. The comments from the reviewers allowed me to improve the paper significantly. The reviews were scientifically deep and objective, which is very valuable because in many journals decisions to publish or not to publish are very unfair and subjective.
I highly recommend that other researchers publish their papers in Genomics Insights.
This is the second time I have submitted a paper to Palliative Care: Research and Treatment for possible publication. In both instances, my experience with Libertas Academica was very good from submission to acceptance. The peer reviewers' comments were insightful, very constructive, and extremely helpful. The author interface was user-friendly. The publishing process was fast and convenient. I highly recommend this journal.
We have had a great experience publishing our paper in Nutrition & Metabolic Insights. The peer review process was rigorous and the journal staff were very helpful with proof processing. We will definitely be submitting future manuscripts to this journal. Keep up the good work!!
The experience with the journal was excellent. The submission process with simple, reviews were expedited quickly, and communication with the corresponding author was excellent.
I have had a great experience with submitting my cancer prognosis study to Biomarker Insights. The comments from reviewers and associate editor are high quality and insightful. Congratulations and keep up the good work.
My experience publishing in Perspectives in Medicinal Chemistry was very positive. The submission process was very quick and easy. I was extremely impressed by the efficiency of the editorial staff and reviewers.
It is a great pleasure for me to be a peer reviewer for Libertas Academica. The review process is efficient, well organized, and user friendly. I encourage others to be a part of this team as an author or a peer reviewer/editor. Thanks Libertas Academica editors and editorial management for maintaining this high level of quality and for their professionalism.
I have to say this was one of my most pleasant and friendly experiences as a peer reviewer. The clear and straight-forward requirements of Ophthalmology and Eye Diseases is a breath of fresh air in peer reviewing.
As the Editor-in-Chief of Clinical Medicine Insights: Reproductive Health, I experience outstanding professional and friendly assistance by the publisher, Libertas Academica, in all editorial matters.
I am very impressed with the professional editorial team at Libertas Academica. They have my highest recommendation.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)