Publication Date: 17 Sep 2009
Type: Review
Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics
Citation: Clinical Medicine: Therapeutics 2009:1 1275-1289
Tigecycline is a first-in-class glycylcycline, broad-spectrum, intravenous antibacterial developed to overcome the two major mechanisms of tetracycline resistance (ribosomal protection and efflux). The drug has been approved in US for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia in adults. In vitro, tigecycline had good activity against a range of Gram-positive, Gram-negative and atypical community-acquired respiratory tract pathogens implicated in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), including community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus, penicillin-resistant Streptococus pneumoniae and multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Nonetheless, tigecycline shows in vitro low activity against against P. aeruginosa. Tigecycline provides high intrapulmonary concentrations that exceed the MIC90 of most of these respiratory pathogens. The combined results of two well designed, phase III studies demonstrated that tigecycline 100 mg initially, followed by 50 mg every 12 hours for 7–14 days was not inferior to recommended dosages of levofloxacin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with CAP. Clinical cure rates were 89.7% versus 86.3% in the clinically evaluable population and 81.0% versus 79.7% in the clinical modified intent-to-treat population. Tigecycline represents an appropriate choice for empirical monotherapy in the treatment of CAP, mainly in patients with risk factors for infections due to resistant bacteria.
PDF (743.48 KB PDF FORMAT)
RIS citation (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)
BibTex citation (BIBDESK, LATEX)
It's been a great experience publishing in Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics. I'm really impressed with the high quality, professional and constructive of peer review in the short time-frame. The editorial team is very helpful and I always received quick answers when I had questions. I am glad to have worked with Libertas Academica and I highly recommend publishing in Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube