Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Journal of Central Nervous System Disease

272,108 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Triggers for Autism: Genetic and Environmental Factors

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 22 Feb 2012

Type: Review

Journal: Journal of Central Nervous System Disease

Citation: Journal of Central Nervous System Disease 2012:4 27-36

doi: 10.4137/JCNSD.S9058

Abstract

This report reviews the research on the factors that cause autism. In several studies, these factors have been verified by reproducing them in autistic animal models. Clinical research has demonstrated that genetic and environmental factors play a major role in the development of autism. However, most cases are idiopathic, and no single factor can explain the trends in the pathology and prevalence of autism. At the time of this writing, autism is viewed more as a multi-factorial disorder. However, the existence of an unknown factor that may be common in all autistic cases cannot be ruled out. It is hoped that future biological studies of autism will help construct a new theory that can interpret the pathology of autism in a coherent manner. To achieve this, large-scale epidemiological research is essential.


Downloads

PDF  (508.29 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML






What Your Colleagues Say About Journal of Central Nervous System Disease
This is my first experience working with the journal and it has been the easiest publication process that I can imagine. The links sent make login simple. The revisions are made so quickly. The decisions are made rapidly. We will definitely be working with this journal again.
Dr Chris Bushe (Senior Clinical Research Physician, Lilly, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results