Nasal obstruction resulting from inferior turbinate hypertrophy was treated by Nd-YAG laser inferior turbinectomy (laser IT). The effectiveness of the procedure was assessed and compared with both functional endoscopic turbinoplasty (turbinoplasty) and con- ventional partial turbinectomy (conventional IT).
Materials and methods: A retrospective analytic study was carried out for 53 patients suffering from inferior turbinate hypertrophy. Twenty patients underwent Nd-YAG Laser IT (Group 1), 24 patients underwent turbinoplasy (Group 2) and 9 patients underwent con- ventional IT (Group 3). Improvement in nasal symptoms were assessed. Intra-operative bleeding, duration of hospital stay, and post- operative medications and instrumentation were compared between the three groups.
Results: The symptoms of sneezing, hyposmia and rhinorhoea were significantly reduced post-operatively among patients in the three groups and there were no differences statistically between them. The Nd-YAG laser turbinectomy group showed marked reduction in blood loss (average = 12 ml per patient) compared to the turbinoplasy group (average = 181 ml per patient) and conventional IT group (average 201 ml per patient). Hospital stay was much shorter in the laser IT group (average = 0.05 days) compared to Group 2 (1.2 days) and Group 3 (1.3 days). Only one patient in the laser IT group required nasal packing, whereas all patients in the other two groups required nasal packing routinely.
Conclusions: Nd-YAG laser IT was effective in reducing the symptoms of nasal obstruction, as well as other nasal symptoms without significant complications. The Nd-YAG laser is recommended as an alternative method, when applicable, in treating patients with nasal obstruction resulting from inferior turbinate hypertrophy.
PDF (476.75 KB PDF FORMAT)
RIS citation (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)
BibTex citation (BIBDESK, LATEX)
I would like to express my gratitude to all the staff of LA's journals. I published twice and I will certainly continue with LA's journals in the future. Thank you for providing a sustainable publishing environment for us.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)