Close
Help
signup_email_alerts
Need Help?



Validation of a Targeted Peer Relations Scale for Adolescents Treated for Substance Use Disorder: An Application of Rasch Modeling

Submit a Paper


Libertas Analytics


1321 Article Views

Publication Date: 24 Jul 2011

Journal: Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment

Citation: Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment 2011:5 35-44

doi: 10.4137/SART.S7367

SART journal

97,671 Article Views

7,152,082 Libertas Article Views

More Statistics

Abstract

The objective of this research is to use item response theory (IRT) to validate a 14-item peer relations scale for use in the adolescent treatment population. Subjects are 509 adolescents discharged from substance abuse treatment from 2004–2009. The person reliability is 0.76 and the Cronbach's alpha person raw score reliability is 0.93 both indicating the scale is a strong metric. The item reliability of 0.99 is high showing the model is reliable. The real separation (8.49) meaning items are placed on the Rasch “ruler” with about eight levels of importance identified. The mean-square statistics of the infit and outfit values were between 0.5 and 1.5 for the items indicating a low level of randomness and thus unidimensionality of the scale. Inspection of a Wright Item Map shows the hierarchical structure of the scale with a moderate degree of inter-item spread. The analysis shows the scale is a reliable unidimensional metric.


Post a Comment

x close

Discussion Add A Comment
No comments yet...Be the first to comment.


share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (Less Than 3 Weeks)
  • Fair & Comprehensive Peer Review
  • Professional Author Service
  • Leading Editors in Chief
  • Extensive Indexing
  • High Readership & Impact
  • What Your Colleagues Say

Quick Links

Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.

BROWSE CATEGORIES
Our Testimonials
I was pleased to serve as a peer reviewer for Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics.  Its scope will hopefully blur some of the lines that still exist between clinical and basic science.  The diligence of the editorial staff ensures the review process is fair, fast and very well-organized.  I highly recommend potential authors and reviewers to submit to and review for this journal.
Dr Sharilyn Almodovar (University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA) What Your Colleagues Say