Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Microbiology Insights

84,760 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Viability of Bifidobacterium Pseudocatenulatum G4 after Spray-Drying and Freeze-Drying

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 23 Apr 2010

Type: Original Research

Journal: Microbiology Insights

Citation: Microbiology Insights 2010:3 37-43

doi: 10.4137/MBI.S2728

Abstract

Viability of Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum G4 following spray-drying and freeze-drying in skim milk was evaluated. After spray-drying, the strain experienced over 99% loss in viability regardless of the air outlet temperature (75 and 85 °C) and the heat-adaptation temperature (45 and 65 °C, 30 min). The use of heat-adaptation treatment to improve the thermotolerance of this strain was ineffective. On the other hand, the strain showed a superior survival at 71.65%–82.07% after freeze-drying. Viable populations of 9.319–9.487 log10 cfu/g were obtained when different combinations of skim milk and sugar were used as cryoprotectant. However, the addition of sugars did not result in increased survival during the freeze-drying process. Hence, 10% (w/v) skim milk alone is recommended as a suitable protectant and drying medium for this strain. The residual moisture content obtained was 4.41% ± 0.44%.


Downloads

PDF  (594.63 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)




Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
The editorial staff of Biomarkers in Cancer are very efficient and helpful.  I am happy to work with them.  I look forward to reviewing future manuscripts.
Dr Xi Liu (National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results