Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes

246,363 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

An Investigation of Hair Cortisol Concentration Across Body Sites and within Hair Shaft

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 11 Mar 2010

Type: Original Research

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes

Citation: Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes 2010:3 17-23

doi: 10.4137/CMED.S4465

Abstract

Cortisol concentrations in hair collected from young male and female adults were assayed and compared for differences along shaft length and between body sites. No significant differences were found between hair shaft sites, supporting a model of the hair shaft as “alive” and responsive to environmental demand in terms of cortisol production. Hair taken from forearms had significantly higher concentrations of cortisol than hair from lower legs, suggesting a localized hair cortisol response and verifying previous findings. Issues of the link between central and peripheral HPA axes are raised for discussion and further investigation.


Downloads

PDF  (531.40 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML






What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes
I would like to congratulate Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes for the professional way it manages the entire publication process.  I am certain it will have a bright future, and reach top positions among endocrine and metabolic journals.
Dr Francisco Bandeira (University of Pernambuco Medical School, Recife, Brazil)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results