Assessment of Applications
Applications are assessed on the basis of the CV supplied. The applicant must demonstrate fluent English and hold a PhD in the same area as the journal(s) selected. The applicant must hold a current research/teaching position that he/she has held for at least 12 months relevant to the journal(s) selected. Applications must demonstrate prior experience as a peer reviewer and author in the same area as the journal(s) selected. Where these criteria are not met or the CV is unclear or incomplete the application will be declined.
Acceptance of your application is no guarantee that your peer review reports will be used by the journal's Editor in Chief or Associate Editor. Reviewers must comply with all peer review guidelines available on this website. Guidelines are subject to change. Failure to comply with guidelines will result in permanent disqualification by the journal's Editor in Chief or Associate Editor.
My experience with the review stages and manuscript processing in Cancer Growth and Metastasis has been of excellence. The fine balance of times utilized for proper scientific assessment of the material and quality control is greatly commended.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)