The commentary emphasizes the immediate necessity to find alternative sources for the production of pharmaceutical heparin to meet the ton-amount world's demand of the glycosaminoglycan. The recent development of a synthetic approach brings considerable new technical and scientifically relevant knowledge to the field, with a strong potential for application in the future. However, the artificial approach does not offer a rapid alternative for the current world crisis affecting the production of heparin, which has to respond to an increasing worldwide demand. It is important to call attention for the availability of marine organisms that are rich sources of heparin analogs with significant anticoagulant activity, low bleeding effect that have been cultivated in very large amounts for years in different parts of the world. Additionally, alternative sources of mammalian heparin, such as bovine intestine and lung have been continually used in countries from South America, Africa and Asia, since the outbreak of the BSE without any report of prion contamination in humans. Recently, it has been shown that bovine and porcine intestinal heparins are composed by different proportions of a mixture of the same fractions that can be simply separated by anion exchange chromatography. In other words, high quality porcine heparin can be obtained from bovine tissue. We believe that alternative animal sources of heparin are currently a more realistic solution than artificial heparin to respond to the increasing demand for heparin.
PDF (425.85 KB PDF FORMAT)
RIS citation (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)
Supplementary Files 1 (47.93 MB M4V FORMAT)
BibTex citation (BIBDESK, LATEX)
This is the fastest progress we have experienced from submission to acceptance. Reviews are fast, pertinent, and instructive. Every step of the process is visible and prompt, and every email is friendly and immediate. In all, it is an excellent experience to be published in Libertas Academica.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)