Close
Help
signup_email_alerts
Need Help?



Clinical Features and Differential Diagnoses in Laryngeal Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma

Submit a Paper


Libertas Analytics


603 Article Views

Publication Date: 06 Dec 2011

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Pathology

Citation: Clinical Medicine Insights: Pathology 2012:5 1-6

doi: 10.4137/CPath.S8435

CMIpat journal

81,019 Article Views

7,152,657 Libertas Article Views

More Statistics

Abstract

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma is the most common malignant tumor of salivary glands. However, it is a rare entity in larynx. Laryngeal cases are frequently misdiagnosed with other malignancies and they are under-reported. So, recognizing the clinical and histological features of this tumor is essential. Laryngeal mucoepidermoid carcinoma can arise in supraglottis, glottis and subglottis. Generally, it presents as a submucosal mass; therefore, progressive symptoms without any identifiable lesion in laryngoscopy must be well considered. The prognosis is somehow dependent on the histological features. In high-grade tumors, recurrence is more common and radical surgery with radiotherapy is recommended. In this paper, we provide a thorough literature review on mucoepidermoid carcinoma in the larynx. The most important distinguishing features of mucoepidermoid carcinoma and its two major differential diagnoses (squamous cell carcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma) are clearly stated and pitfalls in true diagnosis of this tumor are discussed.


Post a Comment

x close

Discussion Add A Comment
No comments yet...Be the first to comment.


share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (Less Than 3 Weeks)
  • Fair & Comprehensive Peer Review
  • Professional Author Service
  • Leading Editors in Chief
  • Extensive Indexing
  • High Readership & Impact
  • What Your Colleagues Say

Quick Links

Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.

BROWSE CATEGORIES
Our Testimonials
Freedom to research is the goal of Libertas Academica.  I experienced a smooth and efficient review system with LA, every step is simple and neat.  It is predictable that authors should have a friendly experience with the manuscript submission system.  I am glad LA contributes as a new, unbiased and scientific community for all researchers all over the world.
Ren Wu (University of Alabama, USA) What Your Colleagues Say