Close
Help
Need Help?



Article Usage Metrics: Altmetrics Collaboration

Posted Mon, Sep, 17,2012

Article_metrics_initial_announcement.png

In the final of our series of articles on our article metrics service is an exploration of the third element. 

Today we discuss our collaboration with Altmetrics who provide a more detailed analysis of the online sharing of articles published in Libertas journals.

Altmetrics use the latest technology to monitor hundreds of thousands of tweets, blog posts, and news stories for references to articles published in Libertas journals and make information on sharing available to authors and readers through each article homepage.

Information is broken down into the website used to share the article and the person sharing the article (public, researcher etc.).

Articles are also ranked within the journal in terms of recent popularity and given an Altmetric score comparable across different articles and other publishers.

View an example of article metrics featuring Altmetrics data

Further reading

Article Usage Metrics: Total Article Views and Views by Month

Article Usage Metrics: Total Article Views and Views by Region

 

share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
I would like to say that this is the most author-friendly editing process I have experienced in over 50 publications. The publishing process of this journal was a most pleasant and productive experience. I was particularly impressed with the regular updates of the progress of my submission. My experience with Libertas Academica was excellent.
Dr Ling Hong Tseng, MD (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and University of Chang Gung School of Medicine, Taiwan)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results