Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Open Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery

39,851 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Operative Myocardial Protection in Patients with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: The Role of Systemic Hypothermia

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 27 Jun 2011

Type: Short Report

Journal: Open Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery

Citation: Open Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2011:4 1-4

doi: 10.4137/OJCS.S6937

Abstract

Objectives: Myocardial hypertrophy represents a great challenge in cardiac surgery. Several strategies have been described to protect the hypertrophied myocardium during cardiopulmonary bypass, and aortic clamping, yet the ideal strategy has not been identified. This study investigates the use of moderate systemic hypothermia (MSH) as an adjuvant method to protect the hypertrophied myocardium in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR).

Methods: Twenty eight patients undergoing AVR were divided into two groups, (Group I) received continuous cold 5–8 °C retrograde blood cardioplegia (CRBC) and their body temperature was cooled down to 23–26 °C. (Group II) also received CRBC but their body temperature was kept at 32–34 °C.

Results: No operative morality (30 days) was noted in both groups. Postoperative reduction in ejection fraction (EF) was seen in nine patients of group I and in twelve patients of group II (P < 0.05). The need for multiple inotropes was more in group II (eight patients) than in group I (two patients) (P < 0.001). IABP was needed in three patients of group II and non in group I (P < 0.01).

Conclusion: Moderate systemic hypothermia might have a role in protecting hypertrophied myocardium in patients undergoing AVR.


Downloads

PDF  (467.75 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)




Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (3 Weeks to Editorial Decision)
  • Fair, Independent Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Indexing
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
I serve as a peer reviewer for Libertas Academica and I would say LA is a great publisher to work with.  The online review system is easy to navigate and the review process is straightforward.  I am really looking forward to reviewing more manuscripts and submitting my own results as well in the future.
Dr Jianxiong Jiang (Department of Pharmacology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links




Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.




SUBJECT HUBS
Author Survey Results
author_survey_results
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.
See Our Results