Publication Date: 27 Jun 2011
Type: Short Report
Journal: Open Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
Citation: Open Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2011:4 1-4
doi: 10.4137/OJCS.S6937
Objectives: Myocardial hypertrophy represents a great challenge in cardiac surgery. Several strategies have been described to protect the hypertrophied myocardium during cardiopulmonary bypass, and aortic clamping, yet the ideal strategy has not been identified. This study investigates the use of moderate systemic hypothermia (MSH) as an adjuvant method to protect the hypertrophied myocardium in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR).
Methods: Twenty eight patients undergoing AVR were divided into two groups, (Group I) received continuous cold 5–8 °C retrograde blood cardioplegia (CRBC) and their body temperature was cooled down to 23–26 °C. (Group II) also received CRBC but their body temperature was kept at 32–34 °C.
Results: No operative morality (30 days) was noted in both groups. Postoperative reduction in ejection fraction (EF) was seen in nine patients of group I and in twelve patients of group II (P < 0.05). The need for multiple inotropes was more in group II (eight patients) than in group I (two patients) (P < 0.001). IABP was needed in three patients of group II and non in group I (P < 0.01).
Conclusion: Moderate systemic hypothermia might have a role in protecting hypertrophied myocardium in patients undergoing AVR.
PDF (467.75 KB PDF FORMAT)
RIS citation (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)
BibTex citation (BIBDESK, LATEX)
I serve as a peer reviewer for Libertas Academica and I would say LA is a great publisher to work with. The online review system is easy to navigate and the review process is straightforward. I am really looking forward to reviewing more manuscripts and submitting my own results as well in the future.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube