Close
Help
signup_email_alerts
Need Help?



Species Delimitation and Global Biosecurity

Submit a Paper


Libertas Analytics

Supplementary Files(47.04 MB format)


1475 Article Views

Publication Date: 08 Dec 2011

Journal: Evolutionary Bioinformatics

Citation: Evolutionary Bioinformatics 2012:8 1-37

doi: 10.4137/EBO.S8532

EB journal

517,966 Article Views

7,185,466 Libertas Article Views

More Statistics

Abstract

Species delimitation directly impacts on global biosecurity. It is a critical element in the decisions made by national governments in regard to the flow of trade and to the biosecurity measures imposed to protect countries from the threat of invasive species. Here we outline a novel approach to species delimitation, “tip to root”, for two highly invasive insect pests, Bemisia tabaci (sweetpotato whitefly) and Lymantria dispar (Asian gypsy moth). Both species are of concern to biosecurity, but illustrate the extremes of phylogenetic resolution that present the most complex delimitation issues for biosecurity; B. tabaci having extremely high intra-specific genetic variability and L. dispar composed of relatively indistinct subspecies. This study tests a series of analytical options to determine their applicability as tools to provide more rigorous species delimitation measures and consequently more defensible species assignments and identification of unknowns for biosecurity. Data from established DNA barcode datasets (COI), which are becoming increasingly considered for adoption in biosecurity, were used here as an example. The analytical approaches included the commonly used Kimura two-parameter (K2P) inter-species distance plus four more stringent measures of taxon distinctiveness, (1) Rosenberg’s reciprocal monophyly, (P(AB)),1 (2) Rodrigo’s (P(randomly distinct)),2 (3) genealogical sorting index, (gsi),3 and (4) General mixed Yule- coalescent (GMYC).4,5 For both insect datasets, a comparative analysis of the methods revealed that the K2P distance method does not capture the same level of species distinctiveness revealed by the other three measures; in B. tabaci there are more distinct groups than previously identified using the K2P distances and for L. dipsar far less variation is apparent within the predefined subspecies. A consensus for the results from P(AB), P(randomly distinct) and gsi offers greater statistical confidence as to where genetic limits might be drawn. In the species cases here, the results clearly indicate that there is a need for more gene sampling to substantiate either the new cohort of species indicated for B. tabaci or to detect the established subspecies taxonomy of L. dispar. Given the ease of use through the Geneious species delimitation plugins, similar analysis of such multi-gene datasets would be easily accommodated. Overall, the tip to root approach described here is recommended where careful consideration of species delimitation is required to support crucial biosecurity decisions based on accurate species identification.


Video Abstract

Post a Comment

x close

Discussion Add A Comment

Posted by Peter Buchanan - 00:43,January 15, 2012

Well presented Laura. An interesting combination of taxonomy, phylogenetics and real-world biosecurity practice.

Peter Buchanan, Landcare Research, Auckland.


share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (Less Than 3 Weeks)
  • Fair & Comprehensive Peer Review
  • Professional Author Service
  • Leading Editors in Chief
  • Extensive Indexing
  • High Readership & Impact
  • What Your Colleagues Say

Quick Links

Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers.

BROWSE CATEGORIES
Our Testimonials
Recently we published a paper describing cloning of a new kinase gene, MLK4, in Genomics Insights. I was impressed by the prompt processing and  speed of publication.  The comments from the reviewers allowed me to improve the paper significantly.  The reviews were scientifically deep and objective, which is very valuable because in many journals decisions to publish or not to publish are very unfair and subjective. I highly recommend that other researchers publish their papers in Genomics Insights.
Dr Eugene R. Zabarovsky (Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden) What Your Colleagues Say